Center for Open Access in Science (COAS) OPEN JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (OJER) ISSN (Online) 2560-5313 * ojer@centerprode.com |
Science Teacher Candidates’ Skills to Ensure Method-Material Harmony and Integration Davut Saritaş * davutsaritas@gmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0002-5108-4801 Emin Tamer Yenen * tameryenen@gmail.com * ORCID: 0000-0003-2359-3518 Open Journal for Educational Research, 2020, 4(1), 31-48 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0401.03031s LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF) |
ABSTRACT: KEY WORDS: science education, teaching method, teaching material, learning environment, teacher training undergraduate program. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: |
REFERENCES: Açıkgöz, Ü. K. (2003). Aktif öğrenme [Active learning]. İzmir: Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları. Amadioha, S. W. (2009). The importance of instructional materials in our schools: An overview. New Era Research Journal of Human, Educational and Sustainable Development, 2(3), 61-63. Basque, J., & Dare, S. W. (1998). Environment and apparatuship Information. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 626-638. Bektaş, F., Nalçacı, A., & Erçoşkun, H. (2009). Classroom teacher candidates' views on the attainments from "teaching technologies and material development" Course. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 2(2), 19-31. Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878. Bozpolat, E., & Arslan, A. (2018). Preservice teachers’ views about the course teaching technologies and material design, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 60-84, https://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.463977 Cabı, E., & Ergün, E. (2016). The impact of instructional technologies and material development course on the teacher candidates’ concern about using educational technologies. Başkent University Journal of Education, 3(1), 37-43. Çalışoğlu, M. (2015). Opinion of preservice elementary teachers about the instructional technologies and material development course. Current Research in Education, 1(1), 23-32. CEH (1997). Science education, education faculty teacher training undergraduate programs. Retrieved from:https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/egitim-fakultesi-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programlari-mart-1998.pdf. CEH (2018). Teacher training undergraduate programs. Retrieved from: https://www.yok.gov.tr/kurumsal/idaribirimler/egitim-ogretim-dairesi/yeni-ogretmen-yetistirme-lisans-programları. Çiftçi Ş, K., Yıldız P., & Bozkurt, E. (2015). Middle school mathematics teachers’ opinions about using material. Journal of Educational Policy Analysis, 4(1), 79-89. Duman, G. B. (2013). Material development and effective use of materials in teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 1(2), 1-8. Fidan, N. K. (2008). Teachers' views with regard to the use of tools and materials in the primary level Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 1(1), 48-61. Gömleksiz, M., Kan, A., & Serhatlıoğlu, B. (2010). Prospective teachers’ opinions about the effectiveness of instructional technology and material development course to have them acquire principles of material preparing. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(32), 1-16. Goodrich, A. H. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education, 4(4). Güneş, F. (2014). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri [Teaching principles and methods]. In F. Güneş (Ed.), Öğretim stratejileri [Teaching strategies] (pp. 61-77). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Güven, S . (2006). The evaluation of teaching technologies and materials development course in terms of competencies it provides (a sample of Inönü Unıversity faculty of education). The Journal of Turkish Educational Strategies, 4(2), 165-179. Hand, B., & Treagust, D. F. (1991). Student achievement and science curriculum development using a constructivist framework. School Science and Mathematics, 91(4), 172-176. İşman, A. (2003), Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. İstanbul: Değişim Yay. Kablan, Z., Topan, B., & Erkan, B. (2013). The effectiveness level of material use in classroom instruction: A meta-analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1629-1644. Kahyaoğlu, M. (2011). The views of elementary teachers on using new technologies in science and technology teaching. EBAD-JESR, 1(1), 79-96. Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2006). Science and technology teachers' levels of using instructional materials: Amasya sample. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 1(1), 190-101. Kazu, H., & Yeşilyurt, E. (2008). Teacher’s aims of using instructional tools and materials. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 18(2), 175-188. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. MNE (2017). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Science education curriculum of primary education institutions]. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. MNE (2017). General Competencies of Teaching Profession. Retrieved from: http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/11115355_YYRETMENLYK_MESLEYY_GENEL_YETERLYKLERY.pdf. Özcan, H., & Koştur, H. İ. (2019). Analyzing pre-service science teachers’ physics materials. Science Education International, 30(1). Özden, Y. (2000). Öğrenme ve öğretme [Learning and teaching] (8th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık. Özer, Ö., & Tunca, N. (2014). The opinion of pre-service teachers towards preparing and using of materials. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 1(3), 214-229. Şahin, T. Y., & Yıldırım, S. (2004). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Saka, A. Z., & Saka, A. (2005). Teacher candidates' level of development of their professional skills in instructional technologies and material development lesson: Sakarya sample. Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty, 10, 81-177. Sarıtaş, D., & Polat, M. (2017). Removing of misconceptions related with some basic science concepts with purpose-built science teaching materials. Researcher: Social Science Studies, 5(10), 73-100. Seferoğlu, S. (2006). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı [Instructional technologies and material design]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2004). Instructional design (3rd ed.). MA: John Wiley & Sons. Ünal, M., Akıncı, Ş., & Şahin, F. (2000, October). Biyolojik kavramların öğretilmesinde modellerin rolü: mitoz bölünme [The role of models in teaching biological concepts: mitosis]. 4th Science Education Congress, MEB Basımevi, Ankara. Woodcock, S., & Reupert, A. (2012). A cross-sectional study of student teachers’ behaviour management strategies throughout their training years. The Australian Educational Researcher, 39(2), 159-172. Yalın, H. İ. (2004). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development] (13th Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. Yanpar, T (2006). Teknoloji tabanlı eğitim [Technology-based education]. In V. Sönmez (Ed.), Eğitim bilimlerine giriş [Introduction to educational sciences] (pp. 187-212). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Yanpar, T., Koray, Ö., Parmaksız, R. Ş., & Arslan, A. (2006). Investigation of hands-on and technology based materials prepared by preservice teachers with respect to the dimensions of creativity. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 45(45), 129-148. Yelken, T. Y. (2009). The effects of materials development based on “creativity activities within a group” on teacher candidates’ portfolios. Education and Science, 34(153), 83-94. Yenen, E. T., & Dursun, F. (2018). Examination of teacher candidates’ opinions on ideal education environment. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 6(6) 1041-1049. https://doi.org/18506/anemon.421565 Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (9th Ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. London: Sage Publications. Zedan, R. (2010). New dimensions in the classroom climate. Learning Environments Research, 13, 75-88. |
© Center for Open Access in Science