OJSP Home

2026 - Volume 10 - Number 2

Between Moral Absolutism and Strategic Necessity: A Critical Analysis of Thomas Nagel’s “War and Massacre”

Dapo Daniel Shaola * ORCID: 0009-0004-5844-4613
Obafemi Awolowo University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ile Ife, NIGERIA

Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 2026, 10(2), 55-64 * https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.1002.02055s
Received: 8 June 2026 ▪ Revised: 24 July 2026 ▪ Accepted: 31 August 2026

LICENCE: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ARTICLE (Full Text - PDF)

ABSTRACT:
This paper offers a critical analysis of Thomas Nagel’s seminal essay “War and Massacre”, situating its moral arguments within the contemporary dynamics of asymmetrical warfare involving the United States and conflict zones in the Middle East, specifically Iran and Israel. Nagel’s influential distinction between absolutist constraints against intentional harm to non-combatants and the utilitarian pressures of military necessity provides a powerful lens for evaluating modern warfare. However, the evolving nature of conflict marked by drone warfare, non-state actors, counterterrorism operations, and blurred civilian-combatant boundaries raises pressing questions about the continued adequacy of Nagel’s arguments. The paper argues that while Nagel’s moral absolutism retains normative force, it becomes increasingly strained under conditions where intentionality is diffused and responsibility is institutionally mediated. By examining U.S. military engagements in the ongoing conflicts between Iran and Israel, the paper demonstrates how the principle of double effect is both invoked and undermined in practice. It further argues that contemporary warfare necessitates a revised ethical paradigm that integrates Nagel’s deontological insights with a more context-sensitive account of collective agency, technological mediation, and global political asymmetries. Ultimately, this study advances a hybrid ethical model that preserves the moral seriousness of civilian immunity while critically interrogating the justificatory narratives employed by state actors. In doing so, it contributes to ongoing debates in just war theory, political philosophy, and applied ethics, offering a philosophically rigorous yet practically attuned arguments for assessing modern conflict. This study employs the method of critical analysis and argumentation.

KEY WORDS: war, massacre, moral absolutism, consequentialism, context-sensitive absolutism.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dapo Daniel Shaola, Obafemi Awolowo University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ile Ife, NIGERIA

REFERENCES:

Chamayou, G. (2015). A theory of the drone. The New Press.      

Guardian (2023). What is a human shield and how has Hamas been accused of using them? Accessed on April 3rd, 2026.

https://costsofwar.watson.brown.edu/paper/HumanTollGaz.

https://time.com/article/2026/04/21/iran-war-civilians-killed/.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj0q964851po.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/30/human-shield-israel-claim-hamas-command-centre-under-hospital-palestinian-civilian-gaza-city#:~:text=The%20IDF%20has%20released%20evidence%20that%20supports,the%20claims%20have%20%22no%20basis%20in%20truth%22.

Luban, D. (2007). Legal ethics and human dignity. Cambridge University Press.

May, L. (2007). War crimes and just war. Cambridge University Press.

McMahan, J. (2009). Intention, permissibility, terrorism, and war. Philosophical Perspectives, 23, 345-372.

Nagel, T. (1985). War and massacre. In Lawrence A. Alexander, International Ethics: A "Philosophy and Public Affairs" Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1985.  pp. 53-75.

Neta, C. (2025). The human toll of the Gaza war: direct and indirect death from 7th October 2023 to 3 October 2025. Accessed on April 3rd, 2026.

Paul K. (2026). Why did Russia invade Ukraine? Accessed on April 3rd, 2026.

Rawls, J. (2017). A theory of justice. In Applied ethics, Routledge.

Rebecca, S, Nandika, C., & Richard H. (2026). 503 women, 413 children, 91 health workers, 9 journalists: these are the civilians who have been killed in the Iran war.   Accessed on May 7th, 2026.

Scanlon, Th. M. (2000). What we owe to each other. Belknap Press.

Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Statista (2026). Number of civilian causalities in Ukraine during Russia’s invasion verified by OHCHR from February 24, 2022 to March 31, 2026. Accessed on April 3rd, 2026.

Thomson, J. J. (1984).  The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395.

Walzer, M. (1977). Just and unjust wars.New York: Basic Books.

Williams, B., & Jonathan L. (2011). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Routledge.